Sumaq Kawsay

At that time was the struggle of two positions with the same identity and essence ideological, Europeans and their civilization, such as the Huns led by Attila were predatory civilizations, of prey and of death, Thanatos from Greek mythology. And fought for the spoils that represent as many Huns as Europeans. Both were the loot for each other, and as such were discussed, one prevailed over the other or the other at the end of the evicted the other by total extermination of the invaders. What didn’t happen with us we accept the invaders in a way pacifica, that while there was some reluctance, is precisely because of the rapinescas intentions that the invaders were glistening. Still only sought cessation of abuses against the indigenous population. It was free before come Hispanics and Western. Even though we know that some Nations were also unhappy with what was implemented through the Incas, who were reluctant to be a Confederation, because there was a belief in the decline of his powers to his people, they did not understand the dimension of a Confederation of Nations, to establish what Pachakuti was very quickly their benefits, economic and social.

What did not happen ever in Europe, who lived one of its worst economic crises and production including health, in which killed thousands and thousands of its citizens. All gotten diseases and for having brought by Westerners. But that is the Sumaq Kawsay?. Javier Lajo defines it as: do together and well everyday things, as a result of the balance between thinking well and feeling well or balance the Yachay and the Munay. But how to apply the Sumaq Kawsay a Creole Republic which is essentially racist and segregacionista?. This need to understand what Amazon brothers, that if you alone want look at the West, having no eyes nor the experience of having sailed the centuries of centuries that did our ancestors.