Organ Donation

Of the mentioned book we rescued the following experience of the relatives: the donation of organs like a Christian act of love to the fellow, was a mirage, an impasse. We were arranged to allow the donation of the heart of our son (a mother says to it), but soon I found out that the doctors had extracted son the heart, the liver, the kidneys and the eyes, and that were even extracted sawing part to him of the hips. Broken in different parts, they distributed its body by all Europe. One had become a recycling object. As a ray reached the recognition to me of which in spite of my indignation, of my increasing sensation of which it had been manipulated in a direction that I did not want, she could not present/display any argument against the donation of organs. My rejection in sensations and my increasing distrust of which the transplant of organs entails a little more what they want to make believe to us, would not preserve to have to say to me yes instead of not in a next one occasion.

But that happens in fact to the other part, that is to say with the person who receives the organ? Of this it is spoken little, in fact the immune system of transplanting of natural form will reject the strange organ of by life, which would have to be a solid indication that the nature had not anticipated this that the modern medicine foments. The immune system is really the guardian of the integrity of the own body protecting it before bacteria and virus, also before other people’s weaves. In addition the transplanted people are more prone to infections, like AIDS or herpes, generating with greater rapidity tumorlike diseases. And so the quality of life that these people longed for, can be in prohibition. If the body cannot expel the other people’s organ due to the treatment, this it remains forzadamente inside and it has to be assimilated of some form.

General Medicine

The doctor expresses his desperation by not being able to convince to him in that he leaves his attitude of risk: my advice like doctor is that you must leave it, you are crushing the liver if the pain begins to radiate to the jaw and the arm, is a threat of immediate death and . (Dary M. Isaacs- General Medicine). To his around, their mother, their fianc2ee, also advises to him that she leaves the diet. The consequences of a nonhealthful diet already are appearing: could not imagine to me that this experiment would be so dangerous (fianc2ee of Morgan) I do not know it, the doctor imagined either that could happen something thus (Morgan). Morgan, in spite of the evidences that its social surroundings (the medical equipment and its family) are showing to him very clearly: the signs (high levels in the analyses) and symptoms (general malaise and depression) that they have appeared they are sufficiently significant like so that one immediate conduct of health begins, that would consist of the immediate abandonment of the diet and the beginning of a purification diet, does not appreciate of sufficient form this threat and, again, realises an evaluation of its capacities (autoeficacia perceived), that consists of the overvaluation of its physical strength.

Morgan decides to continue the experiment with the justification of which in 12 days than it has left more is not possible that to enfer to me as much as so that he is not irreversible. We are, clearly, before a risk conduct. Making reference to the model of Bishop, by which all the individuals are going to have an active paper with respect to adopting a responsibility conduct on the decisions on their health, promoting the adoption of these personal responsibilities, in the case of this conduct of Morgan, to continue with the experiment although their health is beginning to see itself seriously affected, Bishop would affirm that it is a clear irresponsibility of the subject with respect to his health.

WordPress Themes